- From: Corey Ford <cford@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:42:07 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
I'm wondering about the intended behavior of a declaration such as { position: sticky; top: 10px; bottom: 10px; } when the element is taller than its scrolling container's height minus 20px (or the analogous scenario with width/left/right). There was a bit of discussion about this last year: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0678.html > > * if top and bottom are both non-auto, and the element is taller > than the scrolling container (or if left and right are both non-auto, > and the element is wider than the scrolling container), then writing > direction gives precedence. Thus in English lrtb, left and top would > override right and bottom if both could not be satisfied simultaneously. > > Right, we need to determine behavior in this case. The behavior of simply ignoring one of the two seems sensible. However, that's not what I see in WebKit (latest nightly). The element appears to be bottom-sticky towards the top of the scrolling container and top-sticky towards the bottom. At the transition between these, there is the strange-feeling behavior that the element moves down the screen as I scroll the page down. Test page: http://people.mozilla.org/~cford/test/sticky-tall.html Is this behavior desirable, and if so, how could it be characterized? Corey Ford
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 23:42:36 UTC