- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:33:38 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 06/26/2013 03:02 AM, Simon Sapin wrote: > Le 26/06/2013 00:12, L. David Baron a écrit : >> I'm a little concerned about the "component value" terminology; I'd >> prefer using a term that doesn't involve "value". But I don't have >> a better idea right now. > > Previous revisions of this spec used "primitive" for this concept, until we noticed that the concept is the same as in Values > & Units: > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-values/#value-defs > > But I understand the desire to make a distinction. Does "primitive" sound better than "component value"? Maybe "component primitive" instead of "component value"? Then at least it ties back to the concept of "component value", but implies it's a slightly lower-level concept. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 23:34:06 UTC