- From: <rune@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:08:00 +0000
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Quoting "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>: > I think it should actually *not* be the 'initial' value, given that > in general the 'initial' value can't be serialized as part of a > shorthand. I'd rather stick to the model that: > * if there's any 'inherit'/'initial' involved, serialization of a > shorthand will fail unless all the subproperties are that same > 'inherit' or 'initial' > * otherwise, the shorthand will attempt to serialize using > appropriate rules, and omitting values that can be omitted. > > (This is even worse for background layers, since it doesn't make > sense to make 'initial' be the value for a single layer when there > are multiple layers, since that layer then *still* couldn't be > serialized into valid CSS syntax if a different layer had a > different value.) That made a lot of sense. I agree. -- Rune Lillesveen
Received on Monday, 24 June 2013 21:08:35 UTC