Re: [css-display]? Compositing, expensive things, and laziness

I mean browser vendors are willing to achieve?


2013/6/21 Robert O'Callahan <>

> Mandatory bikeshed: "display-optionality" is a horrible name :-)
> I would prefer an approach that can't lead to content breaking in the
> absence of support for this property. Content waiting for the
> optionalElementRendered event could break. Can this be fixed?
> Rob
> --
> Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le
> atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa
> stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm
> aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt
> wyeonut thoo mken.o w

Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 02:51:27 UTC