W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2013

Re: [css-display]? Compositing, expensive things, and laziness

From: 一丝 <yiorsi@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:50:41 +0800
Message-ID: <CA+-d5ZoTSDAQWmtkMrUV0KA9VM+wtXe_rBvJ91ozRPReWhVkMA@mail.gmail.com>
To: robert@ocallahan.org
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
I mean browser vendors are willing to achieve?


2013/6/21 Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>

> Mandatory bikeshed: "display-optionality" is a horrible name :-)
> I would prefer an approach that can't lead to content breaking in the
> absence of support for this property. Content waiting for the
> optionalElementRendered event could break. Can this be fixed?
> Rob
> --
> Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le
> atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa
> stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm
> aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt
> wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 02:51:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:29 UTC