- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:58:40 -0700
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, W3C WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: > On 6/14/13 10:31 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>Hmm. The whole reason I took Shadow DOM >>down the pseudo-element route was to keep the distribution selector >>from being a "normal selector", because it's really not - there's some >>tree-jumping going on. But using an at-rule to break up the selectors >>accomplishes the same thing, and looks like it might indeed be easier >>from an authoring perspective, and better for nesting purposes. >> >>Okay, I guess I'm not opposed to switching back to an at-rule. > > One of the main reasons I changed region styling to a pseudo-element is to > match the distribution selector. It did not make sense to me to have two > different ways of combining a container selector with a content selector. > > Are you planning now on switching to an @distributed rule? I'll finally be returning to the office tomorrow. Give me until the end of the week and I'll report back. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 06:59:27 UTC