- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:56:08 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "Eric A. Meyer" <eric@meyerweb.com>
On Jun 14, 2013, at 11:09 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: >> I wonder if the type for shape from images should change from <uri> to >> <image>. > > Yes, please. <url> is *not* a sufficient description of the image > type - it excludes things like the image() function. Please reference > Values & Units <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-values/#images> when you > do so. I think that is the point. This would also allow CSS gradients and the image() function (if the later does not get postponed.). Greetings, Dirk > > ~TJ >
Received on Monday, 17 June 2013 16:56:40 UTC