- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:19:42 +0200
- To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Cc: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, Timmy Willison <timmywillisn@gmail.com>, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, adrian@featurist.co.uk
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:57 PM, François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote: >> In numerous past discussions (sorry I cant scoop together links right >> now) it had been decided that the above would be an error. In fact, >> IIRC it was one of the reasons for not using :has() which has been in >> jquery for... well... forever and was one of the original proposals >> from like 1999 or something. > > There's absolutely no valid performance reason to do this. Since "a! + b! c" > is just sugar for "a! + b c, a + b! c" it doesn't introduce any perf issue > that the former doesn't already. Agreed. I think I'm willing to champion the multiple-subject behavior. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 22:20:29 UTC