- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:44:25 +0900
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>
Yesterday, Muarakami-san invited me to dinner with a group of 10
Japanese typographers / type designers / DTP operators. Naturally,
I put them to work on the question of the day, tate-chu-yoko.
We started out with two options, A) force to 1em and B) do nothing.
The table was split about 4-2, but two others held out for an option
C) "It depends". After much discussion in Japanese, the group at the
table came to consensus on the following rules:
1. If 1/N-width glyphs are available, use those. Otherwise
use regular glyphs.
2. If the resulting composition fits within the 'line-height',
don't scale.
3. If the resulting composition is wider than the 'line-height',
scale to fit within the 'line-height'.
I asked if they were ok with the implication that TCY might conflict
with ruby if the line-height were too small, and they said it's
acceptable, and assured me that these are the rules they want.
Here is the drawings we used for the discussion:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Jun/att-0069/shinjuku-2013-06-11.png
I would like to edit CSS Writing Modes to reflect this consensus.
Are there any objections to this?
~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 05:44:54 UTC