- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:14:10 -0700
- To: Bem Jones-Bey <bjonesbe@adobe.com>, W3C WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On 6/7/13 3:06 PM, "Bem Jones-Bey" <bjonesbe@adobe.com> wrote: >The current CSS Shapes draft[1] says that if the corner radii for >rectangle and inset-rectangle follow the rules for corner radii for the >SVG rect basic shape[2]. In the case of the radii being large enough that >they would intersect, the SVG spec says that the radii in question should >be clamped to 50% of it's associated rectangle edge (rx gets clamped to >50% width, ry gets clamped to 50% height). However, CSS Backgrounds and >Borders defines a different rule for CSS border radius for this >situation[3]. It seems like it would make the most sense for CSS Shapes >to use the same behavior as border-radius to be consistent with the >expectations of authors. What do you think? > >Thanks, >- Bem > >[1]: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-shapes/ >[2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/shapes.html#RectElement >[3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#corner-overlap I agree. I've switched the corner overlap solution to use the CSS method instead of the SVG method. Thanks, Alan
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2013 21:14:39 UTC