- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:09:56 +0900
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hi,
The 'additive' system, as currently defined, has some pathological
cases. For example:
@counter-style funky {
system: additive;
additive-symbols: 3 ⚂, 2 ⚁;
}
The current algorithm will find a representation for value = 4 (It will
use ⚂ once, and then exhaust the list searching for a way to represent
1.) while ⚁⚁ is a valid representation for 4 per the additive rules.
However, fixing this would require much more algorithmic complexity, it
sounds like the NP-complete Knapsack problem.
(Note: having a symbol with value 1 guarantees that this is issue never
happens for a given style.)
I suggest adding a note saying that the algorithm is known (and
expected) to not find a solution in some cases where a solution exists,
and authors designing their own additive counter styles should be
careful about this.
--
Simon Sapin
Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 05:10:23 UTC