On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 08:50:17 +0200, Masataka Yakura <myakura.web@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Looking at first-line-selector-011 I get confused. > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/latest//first-line-selector-011.htm > > The spec says "The first line of an inline-block cannot be the first > formatted line of an ancestor element", so the first >"Test" in the > <span> element cannot be the first formatted line because it has > `display: inline-block` set. Hence, div:first->line { color: green } > does not apply to the <span> and it should show red. > > However, the test says it "passes if there is no red visible on the > page." That's wrong, isn't it? It should either say >"there is no green > visible", or switch the colors in the stylesheet. > > Why I'm confused is that both Gecko and Presto "passes" the test. They > show green. Which one is wrong; those two engines, or >the spec? I think both are correct. :-) But perhaps the spec could be more elaborate. This statement is true: "The first line of an inline-block cannot be the first formatted line of an ancestor element" But I don't think it's the whole truth. The inline-block takes part in an inline formatting context and can be part of the first line as such. I would expect an inline-block that ends up on the first line of an ancestor element to get the first-line style for that ancestor like in this example (Gecko and Presto match my expectations): <!DOCTYPE html> <style> div::first-line { color: green; } span { display: inline-block; } span::first-line { color: purple; } </style> <div>Green Green <span>Purple<hr>Green</span> Green<br>Not green.</div> These are my intuitive expectations and not rooted in any spec discussions I've seen. I'm not sure about ::first-letter. -- Rune LillesveenReceived on Wednesday, 5 June 2013 08:25:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:28 UTC