Le 04/06/2013 08:16, Håkon Wium Lie a écrit : > Morten Stenshorne wrote: > > > > Bert Bos<bert@w3.org> writes: > > > > Apart from this max(), the W is indeed the same in all three cases, so > > > how about showing just the three cases for N, like in your version, but > > > purely declaratively, and then the W separately: > > > > > > if column-width = auto then > > > N := column-count > > > else if column-count = auto then > > > N := max(1, floor((U + column-gap)/(column-width + column-gap))) > > > else > > > N := min(column-count, max(1, > > > floor((U + column-gap)/(column-width + column-gap)))) > > > > > > And: > > > > > > W := max(0, ((U + column-gap)/N - column-gap) > > > > Looks good. > > Done. > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-multicol/#pseudo-algorithm Thanks. This applies the changes the Working Group resolved on at the last F2F meeting, and addresses the concerns I’ve been expressing since September last year about the "unknown available width" concept. Cheers, -- Simon SapinReceived on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 07:05:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:30 UTC