- From: Mihnea-Vlad Ovidenie <mihnea@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 09:07:22 +0100
- To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 7/31/13 1:04 AM, "François REMY" <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote: >Just another reason why not having getNamedFlow(id) is problematic: > >- you may want to ask the NamedFlow for a flow that doesn't exist yet >because the style hasn't been computed (or, depending on the browser, it >may or may not have been computed because of different codepaths). I am not sure about this use-case. Why would you want to do such thing? Can you please elaborate? > >- if you do so, you receive null or undefined with the current method, >because it returns a static list of currently active flows, but cannot >guarantee you it's up-to-date orelse it would have to flush the layout in >the same way as offsetHeight does. > >- there's no way to tell the browser you want to get the corresponding >named flow immediately in order to setup events on it, even if it's >currently not in use. Again, I would like to understand more about the use-cases you are thinking. Before moving further with the discussion, would you like to detail the behavior of getNamedFlow(flow_identifier) method? Is this method supposed to stay on the Document interface? What should return this method in the case you are calling with a flow_identified that does not exist at the call time? Cheers, M.
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 08:07:51 UTC