- From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:43:39 +0200
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2013 16:44:08 UTC
> > When an element is inserted, if the sibling-invalidation map of its previous sibling does not return zero, we reevaluate his next siblings. Otherwise we don't. > > That's not good enough, unfortunately. Consider this selector: > > div ~ span + i > > and a DOM that looks like this: > > <div/><p/><i/> > > and then a <span> is inserted. There are no flags in your setup for tag > names, right? Because I considered tag names impossible to changes. I may indeed want to introduce some flags for tag names in the sibling-invalidation set specifically, because in this case element insertion/removal can indeed "modify" them. Good point. > Also, inserting or removing a node can cause restyling of its parent or > its preceding siblings, not just of following siblings. Really, in which cases? I agree about the layout (this is a different story), but the styling cannot match backward, can it?
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2013 16:44:08 UTC