On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 01:07 +0100, Simon Sapin wrote: [...] > This seems like a convoluted way of saying than we should support two > different X / Y values, which I agree is the right thing to do. Yes. Sorry for being convolved. > But given that the less-complex version of this property is already > at-risk, I was also suggesting a fallback plan in case some implementers > reject the additional complexity. If it's implemented in weasyprint it'll be less at risk. > Earlier I missed that PNG supports resolution metadata at all because it > doesn’t use that name, but yes, that should be supported as well. +1 -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xmlReceived on Saturday, 27 July 2013 00:15:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:32 UTC