Re: [css3-flexbox] spec contradicts itself about display: table-row; flex items

On 07/19/2013 10:18 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> The box-model fixup stuff is meant for more than just tables, though
> that's the only thing that matters *so far*.  For example, ruby markup
> is supposed to let you do a naked "<rt>foo<rb>bar" and have that fixed
> up with a display:ruby container around it, I think.  Similarly with
> run-in when we define that - we definitely want run-ins to move around
> in the box tree before they get forced into being flex items.

Definitely agree with all that. We need to keep that in there,
just a question of what makes the most sense for tables.


Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 22:20:02 UTC