W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2013

Re: [css3-flexbox] spec contradicts itself about display: table-row; flex items

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:19:35 -0700
Message-ID: <51E9BB77.5040700@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 07/19/2013 10:18 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> The box-model fixup stuff is meant for more than just tables, though
> that's the only thing that matters *so far*.  For example, ruby markup
> is supposed to let you do a naked "<rt>foo<rb>bar" and have that fixed
> up with a display:ruby container around it, I think.  Similarly with
> run-in when we define that - we definitely want run-ins to move around
> in the box tree before they get forced into being flex items.

Definitely agree with all that. We need to keep that in there,
just a question of what makes the most sense for tables.

Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 22:20:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:32 UTC