- From: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:19:58 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style\@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> writes: > Everybody's least-favorite topic! (Mine anyway.) http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#abs-non-replaced-width "But rather than actually calculating the dimensions of that hypothetical box, user agents are free to make a guess at its probable position." What's not to like? :) > The section on static positions of flex items is marked at-risk. > It's an open issue in Grid Layout. I'd like to start a discussion > on this topic, with consideration for > - what makes sense for Grid Layout > - what's implemented so far for Flexbox and Grid If anyone still cares about Presto, I can tell you that its flexbox implementation follows the spec here. If there are no good use cases for this (I cannot think of any), it's pretty unimportant how it's specced, but it would be nice if it is well-defined (it already is) and as simple as possible. -- ---- Morten Stenshorne, developer, Opera Software ASA ---- ---- Office: +47 23692400 ------ Mobile: +47 93440112 ---- ------------------ http://www.opera.com/ -----------------
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 11:20:16 UTC