Re: [css-flexbox] "flex: 1;" does the wrong thing in min-size constraint sizing

On 05/23/2013 07:13 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Daniel Holbert <> wrote:
>> So are we OK with making "flex" shorthand set the flex basis to 0% by
>> default, then, since that has the dont-shrink-me-bro properties that Tab
>> was looking for in [1]?
> I think so, yes.

Ok, I've checked in the changes requested here. However I have a major
concern: percentages inside indefinite flex containers are undefined.

So, do we need to define them or what? Because this set of changes
just made the situation Tab posted undefined.


Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 01:17:27 UTC