W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2013

Re: [css-flexbox] "flex: 1;" does the wrong thing in min-size constraint sizing

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 18:17:00 -0700
Message-ID: <51E8938C.5080600@inkedblade.net>
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 05/23/2013 07:13 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> So are we OK with making "flex" shorthand set the flex basis to 0% by
>> default, then, since that has the dont-shrink-me-bro properties that Tab
>> was looking for in [1]?
>
> I think so, yes.

Ok, I've checked in the changes requested here. However I have a major
concern: percentages inside indefinite flex containers are undefined.

So, do we need to define them or what? Because this set of changes
just made the situation Tab posted undefined.

~fantasai
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 01:17:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:32 UTC