W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2013

Re: specifying position:sticky

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 15:57:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLYAuKVeN-Y159N8-8zm2DszoBNjDOUPMBp8Pb08Uru84g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
Cc: Corey Ford <cford@mozilla.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote:

> This feature needs to work on table elements; the single most
> important use case is <thead>.

I think Corey's proposal should Just Work for table parts if we adopt the
language currently in CSS3 for "position:relative" to cover 'sticky' as

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
Received on Sunday, 14 July 2013 22:57:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:32 UTC