W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2013

Re: [css-masking] 'mask: none' clear all masking operations

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 15:50:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLaXNDqL+9_Mm20XqcEzXhuarqKsA5S5N+xDsEioUSjKuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:

> Not sure if we agreed on that. This would basically mean that we need to
> fetch the resource first, analyze it and then (if necessary) either fetch
> the same resource with different policies or (if the implementation is
> smart enough) allow changing the policies of the resource on fly. The later
> one is difficult, since the initial fetching decision decides about the
> fetching that the resource is allowed to do on it's own (SVG image that
> references further images vs. SVG mask that fetched further images).
>

I thought we'd agreed to use the SVG image fetching model for SVG resource
loads (at least, for SVG mask loads).

mask-image: url(test.svg#notThere)
>
> 1) fetch the resource as SVG mask resource because we found a hash
> 2) analyze if the hash exists
>         a) if it does: continue as normal
>         b) if it does not: refetch resource with different policies, since
> CSS Image is not allowed to fetch further resources, while SVG mask
> resource was allowed to.
>

Yes. I thought we'd agreed to change the SVG mask resource model.

I'm referring to the thread which ended near this message from you:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2013AprJun/0185.html
I guess we didn't quite agree, but it seemed to me that we nearly did :-).

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*
Received on Sunday, 14 July 2013 22:50:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:32 UTC