Re: [filter-effects] url() as pass-through on invalid reference?

• From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
• Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:31:01 -0400
• To: www-style@w3.org
• Message-ID: <51E07595.8060102@mit.edu>

On 7/12/13 5:25 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> I feel pretty strongly that the SVG behavior is not appropriate. I think
> any sort of invalid 'filter' value, including a <filter> element with a
> child element of unknown type, should cause the filtered element to be
> rendered normally (i.e. 'filter' treated as 'none'). Otherwise I think
> introducing new <fe> SVG element types does not get useful fallback.

OK, should that be raised as an issue on SVG, then?  I feel like we 
should have consistency between the case when there is only one url() in 
'filter' and the case when there are multiple things including a url()...

-Boris

Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 21:31:31 UTC