Since shape-outside doesn't affect the rendering of the element it is applied to, would that actually be a circular reference in that case? (It would definitely be an issue if you tried to use it to define a shape-inside, but that's level 2. :-) - Bem On Jul 12, 2013, at 02:49 , Lea Verou <lea@w3.org<mailto:lea@w3.org>> wrote: I believe using the element() function to reference the same element is invalid [1] [1]: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-images/#element-cycles Lea Verou W3C developer relations http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿ http://lea.verou.me<http://lea.verou.me/> ✿ @leaverou On Jul 12, 2013, at 12:29, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org<mailto:robert@ocallahan.org>> wrote: Why not use an element() image value? Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 16:21:39 UTC