- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:14:22 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 07/10/2013 11:18 AM, John Hudson wrote: > On 10/07/13 1:18 AM, John Daggett wrote: > >> Note: ordinals are not superscripts even though they are often >> confused with them. > > More precisely, an ordinal is a text unit consisting of a number followed by an alphabetic sequence, whose purpose is usually > to adjectivise the number. Looked at another way, an ordinal is an abbreviated form of writing the adjectival form, e.g. 6th > instead of sixth. In terms of display, there are three common conventions for ordinals: 1) using normal alphabetic glyphs, 2) > using superscript alphabetic glyphs, 3) using underlined superscript alphabetic glyphs. The latter conventions is both locale > and type design specific, so some fonts will provide for Iberian and Italian ordinals, e.g. 2ª and 8º, with underlined > superscripts and others with plain superscripts. > > The OpenType Layout <ordn> features provide for mapping from regular lowercase letters to ordinal indicator letters, which may > be identical to regular superscript letters, or might be underlined superscript variants. In practice, there is a fair amount > of variety in how different font makers approach this feature, so results of applying <ordn> will vary. Some font makers map > only the Iberian underlined {a} and {o} in the <ordn> feature, recommending to users to apply the <sups> feature if they want > to use plain superscripts in ordinals. What's used for the zeros in 1.00 when it's written looking kinda like 1°°? ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 00:14:50 UTC