- From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 23:23:17 +0200
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> However, a seamless iframe's width *does* depend on its content. This > obviously causes issues. I think you meant height here. I agree it probably make sense to use the height of the parent window. > More widely, what about other conditional rules, most specifically @document? > > I think it makes the most sense to declare that, for the purpose of > all conditional rules, seamless iframes are treated as being in the > outer page. I can see a case where Discuss-like components would like to react on the actual width of the iframe, not the width of the parent page. I can also see how you may not want to leak your document url to Discuss because the url could contain sensitive information (so that covers the @document thing). That may need some more reflection.
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2013 21:23:44 UTC