- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 05:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
- To: www-style@w3.org
Koji Ishii wrote: > It looks to me that we're in consensus, right? > > We all want to avoid UA to use poorer methods such as scaling when > all grapheme clusters have the corresponding width-variant glyphs, > and we all are perfectly fine to allow UA to do additional tweaking > when it can produce even better results under some conditions. > > And it looks to me that it is exactly what we resolved in the last > conf call. > > So, no one is objecting to the resolution, we're just confirming > that we are on the same page. Correct? Actually, I think I do see consensus given the responses on the list. User agents should be *required* to use width-specific variants when the font has them. This was *not* the resolution on the last call, the resolution on the last call said this should be suggested but *optional*. John Daggett
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 12:49:41 UTC