- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 15:33:40 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:52 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> So, while creating examples for the 'default' keyword,
> Tab and I realized two things:
>
> 1. There is no good use case for this. There are some problems
> it halfway solves (like undoing display: none), but will be
> better solved by other mechanisms we have in the pipeline.
>
> 2. Default is a terrible name for "initial-or-inherit". Consider:
> html { font: 16px Authors Favorite Font; }
> article.main { font: default; /* use user's default */ }
> You'd think that would work, right? But it doesn't work,
> because 'default' in this case resolves to 'inherit'.
3. The .defaultStyle object defined by CSSOM (which seems useful)
actually returns a different value than either of the current
proposals for 'default'; CSSOM runs both cascading and inheritance
without author styles, while the keyword currently only affects the
cascade (author rules from further up the tree can still inherit into
the element).
~TJ
Received on Monday, 1 July 2013 22:34:27 UTC