Currently, Selectors 4 [1] says: > CSS implementations conformant to Selectors Level 4 must use the ‘fast’ profile for CSS selection. I'm not sure what this leaves besides the Selectors API, but shouldn't UAs use the complete profile for non-interactive media as well, such as print? The performance issues are not present there, right? Also, why is this a "must" and not a "may"? With this wording, if a UA finds a way to support the complete profile for CSS Selection, it will be a spec violation! Or am I missing something? [1]: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4 [2]: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#profiles Lea Verou W3C developer relations http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿ http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverouReceived on Monday, 1 July 2013 18:45:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:31 UTC