- From: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 21:45:46 +0300
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 1 July 2013 18:45:55 UTC
Currently, Selectors 4 [1] says: > CSS implementations conformant to Selectors Level 4 must use the ‘fast’ profile for CSS selection. I'm not sure what this leaves besides the Selectors API, but shouldn't UAs use the complete profile for non-interactive media as well, such as print? The performance issues are not present there, right? Also, why is this a "must" and not a "may"? With this wording, if a UA finds a way to support the complete profile for CSS Selection, it will be a spec violation! Or am I missing something? [1]: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4 [2]: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#profiles Lea Verou W3C developer relations http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿ http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou
Received on Monday, 1 July 2013 18:45:55 UTC