- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:41:24 +0100
- To: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>
- CC: Nick Cameron <nick.r.cameron@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 01/07/2013 16:11, Leif Arne Storset a écrit : >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-images-3/#sizing >> >> This involves a 'specified size' (which is not set for anonymous images >> in the 'content' property), the 'intrinsic size' of the image (gradients >> don’t have any) and the 'default size' which depends on the context, 1em >> by 1em for list markers. > I think this should be defined explicitly in Lists. CSS Images 3 gets this > length for the default object size by interpreting CSS 2.1 as defining it, > but that reasoning is in an example and if Lists is to supersede CSS 2.1 > it should state the default object size directly. Agreed, Lists 3 should define the default object size of images defined with the 'list-style-image' property, and perhaps override that of images defined with the 'content' property when used on the ::marker pseudo-element. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Monday, 1 July 2013 15:41:48 UTC