Le 29/01/2013 00:19, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : > I couldn't figure out what I was trying to do with it. Since the > behavior in the spec is clearly nonsensical, and I can't figure out > what I was trying to do, I can't fix it, and so I've just removed it. At-rule-prelude mode has something similar. > The other clause didn't make any sense either, so I've fixed it up to > do the right thing - when you see a top-level } in a selector, it just > throws away the style rule being constructed, switches to the parent > rule's mode, and reprocesses the }. This makes sense for a selector in a rule-filled at-rule, but for a top-level selector I think you get an infinite loop. Reprocess the } which falls in "anything else" in top-level mode which leads you back to selector mode on the same token. In a top-level selector I think you just want to append the } token to the selector and leave to the selector parser to declare it invalid. I think you can also get rid of the Next-block error mode and Next-block-or-statement error mode. Also, EOF in selector or at-rule prelude mode should be a parse error + discard the current rule rather than finish parsing. -- Simon SapinReceived on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 00:00:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:23 UTC