- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:19:25 -0800
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: >> It was not obvious to me that the stylesheet is counted among the three. If >> there is a reason to keep this behavior, please add a some explanation for >> "three" in a note (and maybe the reason too). > > It's in the definition of "stack of open rules". > > I'll definitely add a note if I can figure out why I did this. I couldn't figure out what I was trying to do with it. Since the behavior in the spec is clearly nonsensical, and I can't figure out what I was trying to do, I can't fix it, and so I've just removed it. The other clause didn't make any sense either, so I've fixed it up to do the right thing - when you see a top-level } in a selector, it just throws away the style rule being constructed, switches to the parent rule's mode, and reprocesses the }. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 23:20:11 UTC