W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2013

Re: [css3-flexbox] Should "overflow: [scroll, hidden, auto]" apply to a flex container?

From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:17:10 -0800
Message-ID: <51032086.8090907@mozilla.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 01/25/2013 03:39 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> I see no reason to require a wrapper just to swap between "visible"
> and "hidden".  "scroll" actually requires a tiny bit of justification,
> because it's not trivial, but neither is it difficult.

"hidden" isn't really any more trivial than "scroll", FWIW -- both of
those values require the UA to set up a scrolled frame, because they
both make their element scrollable via the "scrollLeft" & "scrollTop"
DOM properties.  (even though "hidden" doesn't provide user-visible

Anyway -- I don't have strong feelings about this, so I won't push back
too much, but I think we do need to clarify the flexbox spec one way or
the other, because right now it implies that overflow shouldn't be honored.

Received on Saturday, 26 January 2013 00:17:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:25 UTC