On Feb 11, 2013, at 4:20 PM, "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > On 12/02/13 10:14 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Ah, this is why we allowed ourselves an extension point. >> >> You can't do it with the syntax you've provided. That asks if the >> implementation supports a "filter: webgl" interface. However, you can >> define a function that asks for that particular support. For example, >> a filter-type() property could work: >> >> @support (filter-type(webgl)) { >> @filter curl { ... } >> } > > I think that might have been what Dirk meant to type. What we wrote on > the whiteboard last week at the SVG F2F was > > @support filter(webgl) { ... } > > i.e. using the functional syntax extension point. Thanks, that is right. Sorry for the confusion. Greetings DirkReceived on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 00:32:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:26 UTC