- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:31:31 -0800
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Feb 11, 2013, at 4:20 PM, "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:
> On 12/02/13 10:14 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> Ah, this is why we allowed ourselves an extension point.
>>
>> You can't do it with the syntax you've provided. That asks if the
>> implementation supports a "filter: webgl" interface. However, you can
>> define a function that asks for that particular support. For example,
>> a filter-type() property could work:
>>
>> @support (filter-type(webgl)) {
>> @filter curl { ... }
>> }
>
> I think that might have been what Dirk meant to type. What we wrote on
> the whiteboard last week at the SVG F2F was
>
> @support filter(webgl) { ... }
>
> i.e. using the functional syntax extension point.
Thanks, that is right. Sorry for the confusion.
Greetings
Dirk
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 00:32:06 UTC