- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:20:34 +1100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 12/02/13 10:14 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> Ah, this is why we allowed ourselves an extension point.
>
> You can't do it with the syntax you've provided. That asks if the
> implementation supports a "filter: webgl" interface. However, you can
> define a function that asks for that particular support. For example,
> a filter-type() property could work:
>
> @support (filter-type(webgl)) {
> @filter curl { ... }
> }
I think that might have been what Dirk meant to type. What we wrote on
the whiteboard last week at the SVG F2F was
@support filter(webgl) { ... }
i.e. using the functional syntax extension point.
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 00:20:56 UTC