W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [css3-conditional] conditionText serialization [WAS]: Review of the new grammar for @supports

From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:23:43 +0100
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <c49d0e79-593b-4d15-80ec-5d3731ec4c41@email.android.com>

"L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:

>On Thursday 2013-02-07 23:51 +0100, Florian Rivoal wrote:
>> On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:30:08 +0100, L. David Baron
>> <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
>> Yes, this accurately reflects is what we agreed to.
>> That said, for the benefit of the reader who is reading this without
>> knowledge of the discussion we had, I wonder if it would be worth
>> being explicit about the fact that collapsing multiple levels of
>> nested parentheses to a single one is one of these logical
>> simplifications we forbid. Your text already
>> implies it, but it might also be misinterpreted to only mean
>> forbidding converting "(not (a:1)) and (not (b:2))" into "not ((a:1)
>> or (b:2))".
>OK, I added the parenthetical:
>  # logical simplifications (such as removal of unneeded parentheses,
>  # or simplification based on evaluating results)

Thanks. That settles it.
Received on Friday, 8 February 2013 08:24:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:26 UTC