- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:51:22 -0800
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thursday 2013-02-07 23:51 +0100, Florian Rivoal wrote: > On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:30:08 +0100, L. David Baron > <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > >I've implemented this resolution [...] in > >http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-conditional/#the-csssupportsrule-interface > >https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/7dace721dff3 > > > >Does that seem ok to you? > > Yes, this accurately reflects is what we agreed to. > > That said, for the benefit of the reader who is reading this without > knowledge of the discussion we had, I wonder if it would be worth > being explicit about the fact that collapsing multiple levels of > nested parentheses to a single one is one of these logical > simplifications we forbid. Your text already > implies it, but it might also be misinterpreted to only mean > forbidding converting "(not (a:1)) and (not (b:2))" into "not ((a:1) > or (b:2))". OK, I added the parenthetical: # logical simplifications (such as removal of unneeded parentheses, # or simplification based on evaluating results) in https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/37491845e530 -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Friday, 8 February 2013 00:51:48 UTC