I think it's good -- it might be a bit vague, but I know what it means & in any case it's definitely an improvement. Thanks! ~Daniel On 01/31/2013 04:29 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com> wrote: >> This has been discussed before: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0438.html > > Based on the discussion there, I've made Anton's suggested edit and > just added a sentence saying that 'overflow' applies to flex > containers. > > Do I need to specify anything further, or is that sufficient? > > ~TJ >Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 21:49:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:26 UTC