- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 06:58:41 -0800
- To: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu> wrote: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles-3 currently says: > > # cjk-ideographic > # This counter style is identical to ‘trad-chinese-formal’ > > whereas previous versions (css3-lists, css-counter-styles) said > > # ... must be treated as an alias for ‘trad-chinese-informal’ > > (The change happened somewhere between 2011-04-22 and 2012-09-24, > before the rename from css-counter-styles to css-counter-styles-3.) > > The browsers I've tested use -informal, and a couple of web pages suggest that > other people are seeing it displayed like -informal in their web browser, and > I've seen a couple of test suites that assert that the behaviour (for a handful > of values) matches -informal rather than -formal. Searching www-style for > strings "cjk-ideographic" and "formal", I see a thread where a couple of people > suggest it map to -informal, and no mention of it mapping to -formal. In > summary, I've found no mention of it mapping to -formal anywhere outside of > this spec. So my guess is that this is a typo. > > If this is a deliberate change, then I suggest adding a note drawing attention > to the change. Huh, that's weird. I must have messed that up somewhen. I'll make sure it wasn't intentional, then change it back if necessary. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 14:59:28 UTC