- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 00:21:23 -0800
- To: MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, 'WWW International' <www-international@w3.org>
On 02/02/2013 12:54 PM, fantasai wrote: > On 02/01/2013 10:33 PM, MURAKAMI Shinyu wrote: >> >> I think this behavior is much better than to hide ruby in many cases. > > OK. So, there are several things we could do with the spec, which of these do > you recommend? > > Question 1: > > Should we remove allowing to hide ruby when emphasis marks are present? > a) yes > b) no Third option: c) Allow hiding emphasis marks when ruby and marks are both present, instead of hiding ruby when both are present. ~fantasai
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2013 08:21:56 UTC