- From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 20:56:05 +0100
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- CC: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> > What I'm not convinced about is an API that has a polymorphic "immutable > > string or live object" return type, because that seems like a footgun (e.g. > > saving the return value and then checking it later has different behavior > > depending on which flavor of the API you managed to call). > > > > David's proposed API does not have that problem. > > Yeah, I like David's API a lot. > Me too, FWIW. It reminds me 'style', 'runtimeStyle' and 'currentStyle' of IE. BTW, it's maybe the good time to support the 'override' style level (more or less 'runtimeStyle' of IE)
Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 19:56:33 UTC