- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 17:54:25 +1100
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- CC: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, David <david.email@ymail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 27/12/2013 1:47 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > In §3.1. 'Layering Multiple Background Images' is the following: > > | Each of the images is sized, positioned, and tiled > | according to the corresponding value in the other > | background properties. The lists are matched up from > | the first value: excess values at the end are not used. > > Considering that 'background-image: filter()' came into the discussion, > we begun talking about a 'background tile' that is not exposed to these > 'other background properties'. The image itself in the url() buried > within the filter function is not effected (sized, positioned, and > tiled) by the 'other background properties'. Only the 'background tile' > itself is effected by the 'other background properties'. I believe I am completely wrong about this. The background tile has the same bounds. -- Alan Gresley http://css-3d.org/ http://css-class.com/
Received on Friday, 27 December 2013 06:54:54 UTC