W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2013

Re: [css3-background] A property to control background opacity

From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 17:54:25 +1100
Message-ID: <52BD2421.1040905@css-class.com>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
CC: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, David <david.email@ymail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 27/12/2013 1:47 PM, Alan Gresley wrote:

> In 3.1. 'Layering Multiple Background Images' is the following:
>    | Each of the images is sized, positioned, and tiled
>    | according to the corresponding value in the other
>    | background properties. The lists are matched up from
>    | the first value: excess values at the end are not used.
> Considering that 'background-image: filter()' came into the discussion,
> we begun talking about a 'background tile' that is not exposed to these
> 'other background properties'. The image itself in the url() buried
> within the filter function is not effected (sized, positioned, and
> tiled) by the 'other background properties'. Only the 'background tile'
> itself is effected by the 'other background properties'.

I believe I am completely wrong about this. The background tile has the 
same bounds.

Alan Gresley
Received on Friday, 27 December 2013 06:54:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:38 UTC