W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2013

Re: [css-shapes][css-masking] Not specified basic shape

From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 23:00:45 +0000
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CEDCAE8A.16804%stearns@adobe.com>
On 12/22/13, 1:32 PM, "Dirk Schulze" <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:

>I forgot to mention another possibility: changing the syntax.
>	auto | <basic-shape> <box>? | <image>
>In which case you can not switch <basic-shape> and <box> unless the
>syntax is changed to:
>	auto | <basic-shape> <box>? | <box> <basic-shape> | <image>

What’s the motivation for fixing the order? I want to be able to specify a
<basic-shape> with no box, a <box> with no basic shape, or both together.
Allowing the together version to be in either order seems like a good
thing to me.



Received on Sunday, 22 December 2013 23:01:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:38 UTC