Re: [css-shapes][css-masking] Not specified basic shape from Alan Stearns on 2013-12-22 (www-style@w3.org from December 2013)

From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 23:00:45 +0000
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CEDCAE8A.16804%stearns@adobe.com>

On 12/22/13, 1:32 PM, "Dirk Schulze" <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:

>
>I forgot to mention another possibility: changing the syntax.
>
> auto | <basic-shape> <box>? | <image>
>
>In which case you can not switch <basic-shape> and <box> unless the
>syntax is changed to:
>
> auto | <basic-shape> <box>? | <box> <basic-shape> | <image>

What’s the motivation for fixing the order? I want to be able to specify a
<basic-shape> with no box, a <box> with no basic shape, or both together.
Allowing the together version to be in either order seems like a good
thing to me.

Thanks,

Alan

Received on Sunday, 22 December 2013 23:01:18 UTC