- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 01:13:42 +0000
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Fantasai and I had a short conversation last week about CSS Regions and elements, which I found very useful. So I'd like to capture what I recall here, and expand a bit on what we talked about. I'm hoping that I express her position correctly - please correct this if I get anything wrong. She expressed reservations about having a single HTML file that contains both content and presentational markup. I can sympathize with that position, but I think that describes current web reality. Server-side mechanisms combine content with a template, and the browser is served a single file containing content and presentational markup all mixed together. I think there are some situations where using flow-into and flow-from can introduce more separation from content and presentation than is seen in current practice. Having separate content and template sections in your HTML file instead of mixing everything together can sometimes make the structure for both sections more clear. But this isn't good enough, in Fantasai's estimation. So I wanted to note how you can use named flows to combine content and presentation from entirely separate files. I believe Fantasai preferred this approach. Combining files is a key feature of IE's current implementation, and one reason we added the content keyword to the specification. The way you create a named flow in IE10 and IE11 is to import a content document into an iframe in a template document. The named flow is created from the iframe's contents, and flows into the elements described in the template. In the current draft, this can be done by using flow-into on an iframe with the 'content' keyword. This use of the keyword is meant to match IE's current implementation, but without the restriction that it only works on iframes. You should also be able to keep the presentational markup separate using HTML Templates, which was one of the motivations for recasting the CSS Regions examples using that mechanism. This turned out to be a bit premature, so I've switched the examples back. But I think it's promising that it was easy to translate the examples to use the HTML Templates proposal. I also brought up the issue of flow-from applying to elements. One thread of feedback we've recieved is that flow-from should only apply to pseudo-elements (or other CSS-generated boxes). This has never made much sense to me. As far as I know, content is the only property that is currently restricted to pseudo-elements, and we're looking to extend its use to elements. I believe Fantasai agreed with me that restricting a new property to pseudo-elements would be a bad choice. Thanks, Alan
Received on Friday, 20 December 2013 01:14:13 UTC