On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:21 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> On 12/17/2013 03:32 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> However, as established by FF, we can at least convert values on >>> opposite sides of the same axis into each other, if we establish that >>> <percentage> can be preserved as a top-level type in a calc() in some >>> cases, which we should do. (I'm fiddling with V&U right now to allow >>> it. It's tricky to spec.) >> >> I'm confused as to why you think V&U needs changes. > > Because right now calc() specifies that a <percentage> resolves into a > <length> (or whatever), but for <position> to work right, we need to > preserve its percentage-ness. Never mind, turns out we'd already added a paragraph that specifies this. I just added a clarifying example to make sure it stands out, using background-position directly. We just need to adjust how <position> is transitioned, and can probably go do that in the Transitions spec. ~TJReceived on Wednesday, 18 December 2013 02:24:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:38 UTC