Re: [css-masking] editorial changes - spec update

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2013, at 2:52 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>> Please add another editorial issue:
>>>> - Section titles should explain the purpose of each property,
>>>>   as in http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-backgrounds/
>>>> Should be easy to fix, and I think would help people find what
>>>> they're looking for if they don't already know what it's called.
>>>
>>> This is not very common across CSS specifications.
>>
>> It's common across specs that fantasai and I edit, and I think it
>> makes it far easier to read and understand the ToC.
>>
>>> Even the 4th level of CSS Background and Border http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-backgrounds-4/ removed the names again.
>>
>> Got your history wrong - B&B4 last had its headings updated before
>> fantasai changed B&B3's headings to be more descriptive.  It's not a
>> revert, just an obsolete spec.
>
> I changed the names following CSS Background and Borders 3. I hope the CSS WG decides to make this a pattern and the two specs won’t be the only specs.

Like I said, multiple specs that fantasai and I edit do this.

~TJ