- From: Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:41:17 -0500
- To: W3C WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
“align-content”, “align-items”, and “align-self” are specified in both the Flexible Box Layout Module [1-3] and the Box Alignment Module [4-6]. Both modules are reasonably recent (Sep 18, 2012 vs. May 14, 2013). Incidentally, the older draft is in the more mature CR status, the newer one WD. Two of the three properties’ initial values are different (“stretch”/“stretch” vs. “auto”/“auto”). There is a mention of interaction with the Flexible Box Layout Module in 1.1 of the Alignment draft [7], but that appears to add to the confusion rather than help :) There’s probably something that explains the situation? Tab, Elika, since you two are listed as authors of both drafts, do you see any low-hanging fruits to reduce confusion? Reflecting the spec fragmentation issue pointed out last week [8] this is actually a good example how it can be rather impossible too to build something more accessible for developers. I personally maintain an index of all CSS properties [9], but instances like this are true nightmares :) Cheers, Jens. PS. I believe there are other property-related issues here but only checked for align-*, as that was a little easier to document. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-flexbox/#align-content [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-flexbox/#align-items [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-flexbox/#align-items [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-align/#align-content [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-align/#align-items [6] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-align/#align-self [7] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-align/#placement [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Dec/0081.html [9] http://meiert.com/en/indices/css-properties/ -- Jens O. Meiert http://meiert.com/en/ ✍ New book! http://meiert.com/everyday-adventurer ✪ New experiment! http://animatedtraffic.tumblr.com/
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 02:42:05 UTC