- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:59:41 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Dec 11, 2013, at 6:22 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 12/11/2013 07:54 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Dec 11, 2013, at 11:46 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> >>> 7. clip-rule is not defined. At all. There's some syntax, an explanation >>> of how the two values differ, and an example, but no definition >>> of what the property actually *does*. >> >> I put the explanation into the example [1]. Examples are normative. > > Specification by example is not OK. And it is not even the relevant part for the specification of clip-rule. The spec says: “" nonzero See description of fill-rule property [SVG11]. evenodd See description of fill-rule property [SVG11]. The clip-rule property only applies to graphics elements that are contained within a <clipPath> element. “” fill-rule gives a detailed description and the last sentence (also normative and not part of the example) says where the property applies to. SVG 1.1 is a normative reference, so no further specification text needed. It is similar to the relation of the mask-* properties and CSS Background and Borders. Greetings, Dirk > And in CSS specs at least, examples are non-normative. > > ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2013 18:00:08 UTC