- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:29:03 +1100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Ojan Vafai <ojan@google.com>
- CC: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@chromium.org>, Levi Weintraub <leviw@chromium.org>, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>, Charles Walton <charleswalton@google.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 5/12/2013 12:09 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > If we drop that, then I want to rework the value space a bit to > explicitly call out what is being restricted, so that we can expand it > in the future to allow authors to disallow scrolling as well. > > I think we can split the existing list into three values, "paint", > "style", and "scroll": > > * "paint" would be #1, #4, and #5 > * "style" would be #6 and #7 > * "scroll" would be #2 and #3 > > Thoughts? > > ~TJ Should #4 read as follows: | The element must "establish" a containing block for | absolutely positioned and fixed positioned descendants. Should #5 read as follows: | The element must "establish" a new block formatting contexts. (For a while there, I was pondering what doesn't produce a formatting context while wondering why a BFC was not mentioned .. :-) then it clicked) Does 'contain: strict' alter the position of boxes with auto offsets? Alan -- Alan Gresley http://css-3d.org/ http://css-class.com/
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2013 03:29:37 UTC