On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Benoit Girard <bgirard@mozilla.com>wrote: > >> >> The problem with that approach is that when some browser adds >>> new-property and extends will-animate syntax to support new-property, and >>> an author writes "will-animate: transform, new-property", other browsers >>> get no will-animate at all. >>> >> >> Can we simply require all identifiers (except all, inherit, initial, >> unset) to be parsed? >> > > Yes, we proposed that. I'm talking about the problem with Ali's approach. > Could we just require the entire list to be parsed, and require implementations to ignore any string outside of the specified set? Then when a new-property is added to the spec, older browsers and browsers that don't care about new-property can treat "will-animate: new-property, transform" as just "will-animate: transform".
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 22:23:55 UTC