- From: Bem Jones-Bey <bjonesbe@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:55:13 -0800
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org Style" <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: "rob.buis@samsung.com" <rob.buis@samsung.com>
Hi Alan, et al. Rob (cc'd) and I were talking about parsing of ellipse shapes[1], and we noticed that the grammer seems to say that both <shape-radius> arguments or none must be supplied, when the spec makes it sound like it would be valid for just one <shape-radius> to be supplied, causing the second to default to closest-side[2]. I believe that the grammar is what is incorrect in this case, but can you clarify? Thanks, Bem [1]: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-shapes-1/#funcdef-ellipse [2]: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-shapes-1/#typedef-shape-radius
Received on Monday, 2 December 2013 19:55:46 UTC