- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:48:53 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 8/28/13 6:52 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> The QuadList interface is terrible. :/ We have better ways to do this >> in WebIDL now - make it an [ArrayClass]. > > All making it ArrayClass does is hook it up to Array.prototype. You still > need the indexed getter and unsigned long length attribute... So the > interface is not particularly terrible. It's the "not hooked up to Array.prototype" part that's terrible. ^_^ You lack all of the Array methods! Also, .item() is weird when you have []. >> (Maybe we can change ClientRectList as well?) > > I think making pretty much every arraylike without a named getter be > ArrayClass is totally reasonable. Yes! ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2013 00:49:40 UTC